Road EcologyThe ecology of roads and their effects has been a primary area of emphasis for me. One of the most fundamental questions that ecologists and managers can ask is how to restore connectivity to fragmented landscapes. The solution in the U. S. and Canada lies not only with ecologists but with North American Departments of Transportation. There is perhaps no greater anthropogenic influence on landscape connectivity than roads. Roads have both direct (animal mortality) and indirect (loss of landscape permeability resulting in fragmentation) effects. In effect, how roads are constructed will in large measure determine if the landscape is permeable, semi-permeable, or impermeable to animal movement; in other words the degree of landscape fragmentation as perceived by individual organisms. Context sensitive road design and maintenance necessarily incorporate a linked mitigation effort at landscape scales. In addition to a co-authored book ROAD ECOLOGY: SCIENCE AND SOLUTIONS, published by the Island Press in 2003, my students and I have addressed the direct effects of roads through directed research, peer-reviewed publications and reports, and presentations at national and international conferences. Road mitigation for large animal mortality has often taken the form of animal exclusion with the construction of high (often 2.4 m or higher) fences. Typically, fences are combined with underpasses or overpasses to allow deer and other animals to access other parts of their range and hence maintain some semblance of landscape connectivity and permeability. However, a common assumption is that fences, once constructed, are ‘deer-proof”. This is seldom the case. Lack of maintenance, as well as erosion, earth slumping, and illegal breeching all compromise the integrity of fences. Deer, elk and other animals do access the highway right-of-way (ROW) and are often killed. My students and I have investigated the effectiveness of the traditional steel one-way escape gates and compared them with newly developed and tested earthen escape ramps. We found that ramps were from 8-12 times more effective in allowing deer and elk to escape the ROW. A valuation of amortizing the costs associated with the retro-fit construction of earthen ramps (approximately $2000 each) suggested that even assuming a very conservative reduction in mortality (2%), costs would be amortized in little over 2 years. This work has been transmitted as a M.S. thesis (HAMMER, M. L. 2002. EFFECTIVENESS OF EARTHEN ESCPE RAMPS IN REDUCING GAME MORTALITY IN UTAH, M.S. THESIS, UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY, LOGAN 65 p., a final report, and a publication is in the last stages of preparation. This work is a continuation of work begun earlier that included 2 research efforts described and listed below. The Utah Department of Transportation constructed and my students and I tested the effectiveness of the newly designed ‘at-grade’ big-game crosswalks and their associated structures. The experimental crosswalks were substantially cheaper than conventional overpasses and underpasses. If effective, they could find nationwide application in helping to minimize the human, economic, and environmental losses that result from deer-vehicle collisions at substantially lower cost than current mitigative measures. We team developed 3 competing simulation models in which highway losses operated in a strictly additive, partially compensatory/additive, and strictly compensatory manner. The partially compensatory/additive model most closely tracked observed population dynamics. Annual variation in demographic parameters offset the impacts of highway mortality at big population densities, however at low densities, highway mortality was severe enough to drive declining population trends. Monte Carlo error analyses were used to check results. The analyses suggested that with no reduction in highway mortality, there was a 90.7 % chance of population decline. With 40, 60, and 80% reductions in mortality, the likelihood of a declining population was 62.4, 41.8, and 22.8%, respectively. The influence of variable climatic conditions was also evaluated. We concluded that: a) mitigation efforts should target greater mortality reductions to help insure that desired population changes occur; and 2) at-grade crossing structures were not appropriate for other than relatively narrow secondary roads. The M.S. thesis resulting from this work was titled: (LEHNERT, M. E. 1996, MULE DEER HIGHWAY MORTALITY IN NORTHEASTERN UTAH: AN ANALYSIS OF POPULATION-LEVEL IMPACTS AND A NEW MITIGATIVE SYSTEM. M.S. THESIS, UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY, LOGAN 82 p). The data from these studies are being used currently by the Utah Department of Transportation in their mitigation measures for high deer kill areas. |

When I'm Not Working
Pretty Boy
Smarty Too
Harlene
